UnOr runs a standing panel of frontier models that cross-examine one another. No single model is trusted — the same consensus drives both sides of the software lifecycle.
The master seat rotates · four models review · consensus decides
A rotating master writes the code; the other four review every change — structured verdicts, fail-closed. Nothing merges on one model's word.
Point UnOr at a repository. The panel separates what's proven from what's merely a lead — Reviewed, Validated, Proven — with signed evidence you re-verify yourself.
The trust layer for autonomous software. Any code, human or AI — UnOr proves it's safe, with signed evidence you can verify yourself.
A governed panel opinion — a lead, clearly labelled.
Cross-confirmed and matched at the exact line in your source.
Reproduced in a sandbox or proven in a formal kernel — beyond doubt.
Independent frontier models cross-examine every finding, then adversarial skeptics challenge it.
Each finding is post-quantum-sealed — proof you can re-check yourself, offline, and hand a regulator.
Sandboxed to the target you choose. On-prem or air-gapped — nothing else is ever read.
Point UnOr at one repository. Get a signed report that separates what's proven from what's a lead — and verify the evidence yourself.
Start a proof of conceptUnOr.ai delivers governed, evidence-backed security assurance. Unless a finding is explicitly marked Proven, it is a reviewed or validated opinion — informative, not a guarantee. The absence of findings is not a guarantee of the absence of defects; coverage is limited to the code and revisions assessed.